<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://yearsforbeards.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yearsforbeards.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on LIST: 2000 to 2009 (Corey&#8217;s Staff Picks) by Corques</title>
		<link>http://yearsforbeards.com/2009/10/28/list-2000-to-2009-coreys-staff-picks/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Corques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearsforbeards.com/?p=181#comment-50</guid>
		<description>What do you mean, so fake?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean, so fake?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LIST: 2000 to 2009 (Corey&#8217;s Staff Picks) by Nevada Zita</title>
		<link>http://yearsforbeards.com/2009/10/28/list-2000-to-2009-coreys-staff-picks/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Nevada Zita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 09:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearsforbeards.com/?p=181#comment-49</guid>
		<description>sooo fake ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sooo fake ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LIST 2009: 50 Notable Releases This Year by best online drugstore reviews</title>
		<link>http://yearsforbeards.com/2010/01/04/list-2009-50-notable-releases-this-year/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>best online drugstore reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearsforbeards.com/?p=305#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Hey, I stumbled upon your site a couple of and have ploughed through all the info quietly.  I decided I might post my firstpost.  Unsure  of what to comment but anyway.  Great site.  Will come back soon to see more of what youve got to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I stumbled upon your site a couple of and have ploughed through all the info quietly.  I decided I might post my firstpost.  Unsure  of what to comment but anyway.  Great site.  Will come back soon to see more of what youve got to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LIST 2009: 50 Notable Releases This Year by Zach Harris</title>
		<link>http://yearsforbeards.com/2010/01/04/list-2009-50-notable-releases-this-year/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearsforbeards.com/?p=305#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Quality and comprehensive list gentlemen. Good show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quality and comprehensive list gentlemen. Good show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on REVIEW: Sufjan Stevens &#8211; The BQE by LIST 2009: 50 Notable Releases This Year &#171;</title>
		<link>http://yearsforbeards.com/2009/10/20/review-sufjan-stevens-the-bqe/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>LIST 2009: 50 Notable Releases This Year &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 04:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearsforbeards.com/?p=119#comment-32</guid>
		<description>[...] Continue Reading [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Continue Reading [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on REVIEW: Japandroids &#8211; Post-Nothing by LIST 2009: 50 Notable Releases This Year &#171;</title>
		<link>http://yearsforbeards.com/2009/10/17/review-japandroids-post-nothing/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>LIST 2009: 50 Notable Releases This Year &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 04:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearsforbeards.com/?p=59#comment-31</guid>
		<description>[...] Continue Reading [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Continue Reading [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on REVIEW: The Flaming Lips &#8211; Embryonic by LIST 2009: 50 Notable Releases This Year &#171;</title>
		<link>http://yearsforbeards.com/2009/10/21/review-the-flaming-lips-embryonic/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>LIST 2009: 50 Notable Releases This Year &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 04:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearsforbeards.com/?p=147#comment-30</guid>
		<description>[...] Continue Reading [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Continue Reading [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on REVIEW: Bon Iver &#8211; Blood Bank by LIST 2009: 50 Notable Releases This Year &#171;</title>
		<link>http://yearsforbeards.com/2009/10/19/review-bon-iver-blood-bank/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>LIST 2009: 50 Notable Releases This Year &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 04:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearsforbeards.com/?p=94#comment-29</guid>
		<description>[...] Continue Reading [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Continue Reading [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Micro Beards: 15 Dec 2009 by Corey Murphy</title>
		<link>http://yearsforbeards.com/2009/12/15/micro-beards-15-dec-2009/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearsforbeards.com/?p=267#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I have to add, the fourth track on the Bjork album is quite amazing.  I didn&#039;t know how I could fit this into my article but, I would definitely recommend checking out this Bell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to add, the fourth track on the Bjork album is quite amazing.  I didn&#8217;t know how I could fit this into my article but, I would definitely recommend checking out this Bell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LIST: 2000 to 2009 (Zach&#8217;s Staff Picks) by John Praw Kruse</title>
		<link>http://yearsforbeards.com/2009/12/08/list-2000-to-2009-zachs-staff-picks/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>John Praw Kruse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearsforbeards.com/?p=250#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I agree.  I think Heavy Ghost is the only one on this list that I&#039;ve never heard, but I&#039;ll definitely check it out now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  I think Heavy Ghost is the only one on this list that I&#8217;ve never heard, but I&#8217;ll definitely check it out now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LIST: 2000 to 2009 (Zach&#8217;s Staff Picks) by Corey Murphy</title>
		<link>http://yearsforbeards.com/2009/12/08/list-2000-to-2009-zachs-staff-picks/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearsforbeards.com/?p=250#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Awesome Zach, these are all amazing.  Looking back, I feel like I missed out on albums like Heavy Ghost.  Also, good call on the Greenwood score.  That is exactly the reason I love that movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome Zach, these are all amazing.  Looking back, I feel like I missed out on albums like Heavy Ghost.  Also, good call on the Greenwood score.  That is exactly the reason I love that movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LIST: 2000 to 2009 (Corey&#8217;s Staff Picks) by imkoreansowhat</title>
		<link>http://yearsforbeards.com/2009/10/28/list-2000-to-2009-coreys-staff-picks/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>imkoreansowhat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearsforbeards.com/?p=181#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really glad to see department of eagles finally getting some recognition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really glad to see department of eagles finally getting some recognition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on REVIEW: Sufjan Stevens &#8211; The BQE by John Praw Kruse</title>
		<link>http://yearsforbeards.com/2009/10/20/review-sufjan-stevens-the-bqe/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>John Praw Kruse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearsforbeards.com/?p=119#comment-12</guid>
		<description>P.S.  I just thought about something.  In Joanna Newsom&#039;s album Ys, Van Dyke Parks wrote the orchestral accompaniment.  What an amazing Frankenstein piece of art they could make if Joanna repeated the process with Sufjan Stevens arranging the orchestration and producing the album.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.  I just thought about something.  In Joanna Newsom&#8217;s album Ys, Van Dyke Parks wrote the orchestral accompaniment.  What an amazing Frankenstein piece of art they could make if Joanna repeated the process with Sufjan Stevens arranging the orchestration and producing the album.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on REVIEW: Sufjan Stevens &#8211; The BQE by John Praw Kruse</title>
		<link>http://yearsforbeards.com/2009/10/20/review-sufjan-stevens-the-bqe/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>John Praw Kruse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearsforbeards.com/?p=119#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;ll have to disagree with you, Corey.  

1) Be careful about calling it techno. It&#039;s definitely not.  I think the inclusion of that great &quot;glitch-pop&quot; section (or whatever you want to call it) is one of the best things about the piece.  Some people seem to be surprised about the style, but it definitely makes sense in the context that Sufjan is going back to his Enjoy Your Rabbit days (with the remake and now this) - especially when you look at his track from Dark Was The Night and the videos of the three new songs that have come out.

2) I think I agree with you about the &quot;pop culture icon&quot; comment.  Sufjan could basically do anything he wants, and the main criticism he&#039;s going to get is that fans want more.  I think this &quot;symphony&quot; is actually really good, though.  Maybe it&#039;s just different than the other symphonies, but I definitely enjoyed it.  It is not a masterpiece, but I do not think that it is amateur either.  Even more important than the quality of the piece is what it is doing for music.  Think of the audience that would never think to listen to this kind of music, but now are because Sufjan did it.  Anything that crosses genre and scene boundaries like this is a-okay in my book.

3) I don&#039;t think Sufjan&#039;s actual songs (with vocals, if that&#039;s what you mean) would have fit with this project.  This is really something quite different than an album.  And with Sufjan saying that he&#039;s not really in the mood to share his songs with people (as he said in a recent interview), I don&#039;t think we could have hoped for some actual classic-style Sufjan songs.

Again, I agree with you, Corey, that this is no masterpiece. But the transition from the more classical parts to the insane electro-glitch-pop-whatever part in the middle of the song is definitely masterfully done.  Sufjan knows what he&#039;s doing.  He&#039;s arranged things like this before, just in the context of his other songs.  It will be interesting to see how his compositional skills compare in his upcoming collaboration (with his father-in-law[?]).

I think the bottom line, perhaps, is that I just enjoyed this album a bit more than you.  And maybe it&#039;s as simple as that.  We certainly have a different background coming in to this release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;ll have to disagree with you, Corey.  </p>
<p>1) Be careful about calling it techno. It&#8217;s definitely not.  I think the inclusion of that great &#8220;glitch-pop&#8221; section (or whatever you want to call it) is one of the best things about the piece.  Some people seem to be surprised about the style, but it definitely makes sense in the context that Sufjan is going back to his Enjoy Your Rabbit days (with the remake and now this) &#8211; especially when you look at his track from Dark Was The Night and the videos of the three new songs that have come out.</p>
<p>2) I think I agree with you about the &#8220;pop culture icon&#8221; comment.  Sufjan could basically do anything he wants, and the main criticism he&#8217;s going to get is that fans want more.  I think this &#8220;symphony&#8221; is actually really good, though.  Maybe it&#8217;s just different than the other symphonies, but I definitely enjoyed it.  It is not a masterpiece, but I do not think that it is amateur either.  Even more important than the quality of the piece is what it is doing for music.  Think of the audience that would never think to listen to this kind of music, but now are because Sufjan did it.  Anything that crosses genre and scene boundaries like this is a-okay in my book.</p>
<p>3) I don&#8217;t think Sufjan&#8217;s actual songs (with vocals, if that&#8217;s what you mean) would have fit with this project.  This is really something quite different than an album.  And with Sufjan saying that he&#8217;s not really in the mood to share his songs with people (as he said in a recent interview), I don&#8217;t think we could have hoped for some actual classic-style Sufjan songs.</p>
<p>Again, I agree with you, Corey, that this is no masterpiece. But the transition from the more classical parts to the insane electro-glitch-pop-whatever part in the middle of the song is definitely masterfully done.  Sufjan knows what he&#8217;s doing.  He&#8217;s arranged things like this before, just in the context of his other songs.  It will be interesting to see how his compositional skills compare in his upcoming collaboration (with his father-in-law[?]).</p>
<p>I think the bottom line, perhaps, is that I just enjoyed this album a bit more than you.  And maybe it&#8217;s as simple as that.  We certainly have a different background coming in to this release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on REVIEW: The Flaming Lips &#8211; Embryonic by John Praw Kruse</title>
		<link>http://yearsforbeards.com/2009/10/21/review-the-flaming-lips-embryonic/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>John Praw Kruse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yearsforbeards.com/?p=147#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Be on the lookout for their new music video.  The video is done, and some people have gotten a chance to see it.  So that hopefully means we&#039;ll get our hands on it soon.

This might be a bit of interest:

http://yearsforbeards.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/gallery_enlarged-flaminglips-video11-490x367.jpg?w=490</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be on the lookout for their new music video.  The video is done, and some people have gotten a chance to see it.  So that hopefully means we&#8217;ll get our hands on it soon.</p>
<p>This might be a bit of interest:</p>
<p><a href="http://yearsforbeards.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/gallery_enlarged-flaminglips-video11-490x367.jpg?w=490" rel="nofollow">http://yearsforbeards.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/gallery_enlarged-flaminglips-video11-490&#215;367.jpg?w=490</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
